[vc_row][vc_column width=”1/1″][vc_column_text]
THE REACTION TO HUMANAE VITAE
by Joseph Selling
Louvain 1977
| TABLE OF CONTENTS (to see full text click here) | |
|---|---|
| FOREWORD | ii |
| TABLE OF CONTENTS | iii |
| INTRODUCTION | viii |
| ABREVIATIONS | xiii |
| BIBLIOGRAPHY (click here to see bibliography continued) | xiv |
|
PART ONE – THE REACTION OF THE BISHOPS TO HUMANAE VITAE CHAPTER ONE – INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND TO EPISCOPAL REACTION TO HUMANE VITAE |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| I | Introduction and methodology; (click here to see the text) | 1 | |
| A. The importance of episcopal reaction | 3 | ||
| B. Methodology | 7 | ||
| II | Preliminary comments | 9 | |
| A. Msgr. Lambruschini’s press conference | 9 | ||
| B. Brief statements of bishops | 11 | ||
| C. Interim statements of episcopal conferences | 14 | ||
| D. Individual statements | 16 | ||
| E. Collective statements | 18 | ||
| III | Background to the collective reactions to HV | 19 | |
| A.The nature of the documentation | 19 | ||
| 1. Pluralism of the reactions | 22 | ||
| Convergence and grouping of the reactions (click here to continue the text) | 25 | ||
| B. The background of the bishops’ collective statements | 27 | ||
| 1. The questions and problems of the pastoral situations | 29 | ||
| a Demographic problems | 29 | ||
| b Socio-cultural factors | 33 | ||
| c Theological factors and questions | 38 | ||
| (1) The influence of the theological community | 38 | ||
| (2) The isolated question of contraception | 39 | ||
| d Summary. | 41 | ||
| 2. The bishop’s method of composing their statements | 41 | ||
| a Local collegiality | 41 | ||
| b Attention to the sensus fidelium | 43 | ||
| c Relationship between the bishop’s reactions | 45 | ||
| C. The bishops’ use of the documents of Vatican II in their reactions to HV | 48 | ||
| 1. The use of GS,16 and DH, 3 | 48 | ||
| 2. The use of LG,25 and DH,14 | 50 | ||
| 3. The use of GS, 50 and 51 | 52 | ||
| 4. Summary | 54 | ||
| CHAPTER TWO – MAJOR EPISCOPAL REACTIONS TO HUMANE VITAE | 56 | ||
| I | The General use and orientation toward the encyclical (click here to continue the text) | 57 | |
| A. The use of the text | 57 | ||
| B. Situating the encyclical | 58 | ||
| C. General orientation to the teaching | 59 | ||
| II | Episcopal correspondence to the moral argumentation contained in HV | 61 | |
| A. The moral arguments in regard to artificial contraception | 61 | ||
| B. The encyclilcal’s teaching on christian marriage | 65 | ||
| C. Evaluation of episcopal correspondence with the encyclical | 67 | ||
| III | The introduction of new ideas by the episcopal statement | 68 | |
| A. New arguments in regard to artificial contraception | 69 | ||
| 1. The conflict of duties | 70 | ||
| 2. The lesser of two evils | 73 | ||
| 3. The importance of motivation | 74 | ||
| 4. The representation of HC as an “ideal” | 76 | ||
| 5. The interpretive use of “therapeutic means” | 77 | ||
| B. New arguments in regard to the theology of marriage | 79 | ||
| C. Evaluation of episcopal divergence from the encyclical | 82 | ||
| IV | The episcopal teachings on authority and conscience in respect of HV (click here to continue the text) | 83 | |
| A. The bishops’ evaluation of HV’s authority | 83 | ||
| B. The bishops’ evaluation of theoretical dissent from the teaching of HV on contraception | 88 | ||
| C. The teaching of the bishops on conscience and practical divergence from the norm of HV regarding contraception | 91 | ||
| 1. Artifical contraception and objective sin | 92 | ||
| 2. Artificail contraception and personal sin | 93 | ||
| 3. The episcopal teaching on consience | 96 | ||
| 4. The extent of magisterial authority | 98 | ||
| D. The bishop’s evaluation of HV’s authority on the theology of marriage | 100 | ||
| V | The actual teaching of the bishops on HV: a summary | 102 | |
| A. The bishops’ teaching on HV | 104 | ||
| B. Correlation of agreement and variance with other factors | 104 | ||
| 1. Attention to extraneous data | 104 | ||
| 2. The formulation of the question for response | 106 | ||
| C. Transition | 108 | ||
| CHAPTER THREE – THE LATER REACTIONS (click here to continue the text) | 111 | ||
| I. | I. The extraordinary Synod of 1969: a question of authority | 111 | |
| A. The synod | 111 | ||
| B. Reflection | 115 | ||
| II. | The later reactions | 116 | |
| A. Yugoslavi (2) : the end of the reactions | 117 | ||
| B. Malta (2) : a theological position | 119 | ||
| C. Indonesia (4) and Mexico (3) : revaluation in the developing countries | 121 | ||
| D. South Africa and Australia (2) : return to the original document | 124 | ||
| E. Ireland (3) | 128 | ||
| III. | Evolution in episcopal teaching | 129 | |
| A. The direction of change | 129 | ||
| B. The collegial process | 130 | ||
| C. The concern for the faithful | 131 | ||
| IV. | Conclusions to Part One | 132 | |
| A. The characteristics of episcopal response to HV | 133 | ||
| 1. Agreement and acceptance of HV | 134 | ||
| 2. Disagreement or mitigation of HV’s negative conclusions | 135 | ||
| 3. The uncertain positions | 136 | ||
| B. The style of interpretation | 137 | ||
| APPENDICES | |||
| A. Chronological list of the episcopal statements on Humanae Vitae | 1 | ||
| B. List of the bishops’ statements in respect to their position on Humanae Vitae | 3 | ||
| C. The bishops’ use of the documents of Vatican ii in their statements on Humanae Vitae | 4 | ||
| D. The bisops’ use of the text of Humanae Vitae in their statements | 11 | ||
v
|
PART TWO – GENERAL AND THEOLOGICAL REACTION TO HUMANAE VITAE |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| CHAPTER FOUR – INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND TO HUMANAE VITAE | 140 | ||
| I | Introduction and method (click here to continue the text) | 140 | |
| II | The historical situation | 142 | |
| A. The situation of doubt | 142 | ||
| B. From Casti Connubii to HV | 142 | ||
| C. Authorship | 147 | ||
| D. What is an encyclical? | 150 | ||
| III | The larger issues surrounding HV | 153 | |
| A. Attitudes around the enclyclical | 153 | ||
| B. Attidudes behind the encyclical | 155 | ||
| C. Data from other quarters | 157 | ||
| IV | HV. and Vatican II | 160 | |
| A. HV and GS | 161 | ||
| B. HV and LG | 165 | ||
| V | HV and the Pondifical Birth Control Commission (click here to continue the text) | 168 | |
| VI | General Response to the encyclical | 177 | |
| A. General orientation | 177 | ||
| B. The good points of the HV | 180 | ||
| C. The core of the encyclical’s teaching | 182 | ||
| CHAPTER FIVE – THE MORAL ISSUES: CONTRACEPTION AND MARRIAGE | 188 | ||
| I | Contraception and the core of the encyclical (click here to continue the text) | 189 | |
| II | The arguments of HV: esposition and critique | 197 | |
| A Natural Law | 197 | ||
| B. Objective moral order | 202 | ||
| C. Intrinsic orientation | 205 | ||
| D. Intrinsically dishonest | 210 | ||
| E. The argument of totality (click here to continue the text) | 214 | ||
| F. Evil consequences | 219 | ||
| G. Therapeutics | 223 | ||
| H. Periodic continence | 225 | ||
| III | The arguments beyond HV: statement and critique | 233 | |
| A. Arguments parallel to episcopal reactions | 234 | ||
| 1. The conflict of duties, Excursus on the conflict of duties as a date of experience | 234 | ||
| 2. The lesser of two evils (click here to continue the text) | 241 | ||
| 3. The importance of motivation | 248 | ||
| 4. Characterization of HV as an ideal teaching | 252 | ||
| B. New approaches to the moral question of contraception | 255 | ||
| IV | HV and the theology of marriage | 260 | |
| A. The general approach of the encyclical | 260 | ||
| B. From responsible parenthood to the ends of marriage | 263 | ||
| CHAPTER SIX – THE AUTHORITY AND CONSCIENCE ISSUES | 269 | ||
| I | Ecclesiological questions (click here to continue the text) | 272 | |
| A. The magisterium | 272 | ||
| B. The magisterium and HV | 279 | ||
| C. Authority and freedom | 281 | ||
| II | The stutus of HV | 286 | |
| A. The argument from tradition (click here to continue the text) | 286 | ||
| B. The validity of the argumentation | 299 | ||
| III | The question of conscience | 303 | |
| A. The notions of conscience | 304 | ||
| B. The norm as morally binding (click here to continue the text) | 309 | ||
| C. The question of sin | 314 | ||
| IV | HV in the public forum | 316 | |
| A. The qauestion of assent | 316 | ||
| B. The right to disscent | 322 | ||
| C. The evalution of reaction | 325 | ||
| 1. The episcopal response | 325 | ||
| 2. The theological debate | 328 | ||
| 3. The lay participation | 331 | ||
| D. The question of reception | 335 | ||
| PART THREE – ANALYSIS OF THE REACTION TO HUMANAE VITAE | |||
| CHAPTER SEVEN – A SYNTHESIS: QUESTIONS OF SPECIAL AND FUNDAMENTAL THEOLOGY (click here to continue the text) | 340 | ||
| I | The moral issues | 343 | |
| A. The question of regulating births | 343 | ||
| B. The whole of sexual morality | 357 | ||
| C. The theology of marriage | 362 | ||
| II | The authority issues | 365 | |
| A. Situating the place of HV (click here to continue the text) | 366 | ||
| B. The ecclesiological questions | 373 | ||
| C. A question of conscience | 379 | ||
| III | Conclusions | 384 | |
[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]



